Charles Broom vs Hamish Stewart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In their recent forms over the last six months, Broom and Stewart demonstrate varied proficiency on their second serve performance. Broom has won 43.9% of these points, while Stewart slightly edges ahead with 46.78%. This statistic is often a strong predictor of match outcomes.

Examining their abilities when returning, Broom shows an ability to win 53.28% of his opponent's second serve points, whereas Stewart captures 45.26%. For first serve returns, Broom wins 23.81% and Stewart 20.9%. These differences highlight potential strengths for Broom in this head-to-head matchup.

From an annual perspective, Broom's win-loss record stands at 46.3% (25/29), compared to Stewart's 65.08% (41/22), providing an overarching prediction framework. Under pressure, Broom saves 64.89% of breakpoints, surpassing Stewart's 55.8%, indicating Broom's reliability in critical situations.

Both players have distinctive surface preferences, with Broom excelling on clay with 67% wins and Stewart on indoor hard courts with 68%. Conversely, Stewart has struggled on grass, registering no victories. This surface-specific performance could be crucial in inclined predictions for surface matchups.

Analyzing tournament levels, Broom predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 43.33% win rate. Stewart, favoring Futures/Satellites/ITF events at the $10K level, boasts a notable 70.91% success rate. This disparity in event level should be contemplated when deducing match favorites.

Direct encounters give Broom an edge, having won their sole previous matchup at M 25 Loughborough in early 2024 with straight sets. With an average match duration of 1:41:00 against each other, both players have never gone to a deciding set or engaged in tiebreaks, suggesting Broom perhaps handles head-to-head pressure more adroitly.

Given Broom's slightly tougher average opposition rank of 343.85 compared to Stewart's 379.56, Broom has consistently played against higher-ranked opponents. Moreover, should this match enter a deciding set, Stewart's 53% win rate over the past year surpasses Broom's 39%, introducing an intriguing dynamic into any long-contested match.

Operational event stats and current form should also be considered when extrapolating performance forecasts; thus, spectators should remain attentive to ongoing tournament performances. In breakpoint situations, Stewart converts 36.89% of opportunities over Broom's 33.33%, an aid for live match expectations.

Given the collective comparison of these statistical indicators, Broom holds a marginal advantage in their anticipated encounter based on historical performances, surface aptitude, and pressure handling traits. As such, Broom may likely secure the victory in this head-to-head rematch, all statistics considered.